Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
For years, free-market think tanks such as the Cato Institute and the Fraser Institute have emphasized the link between economic freedom and prosperity. This month, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics to three men whose work confirmed the nexus.
The award went to Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson, both of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and James Robinson of the University of Chicago. The latter school has a long history of embracing economic theory that recognizes the value of liberty and individual autonomy. The men received the accolade for research on “how institutions are formed and affect prosperity.”
Without getting too detailed about the intricacies of their work, nations with more “inclusive” institutions — market-oriented democracies that respect property rights and the rule of law — have the best chance of creating long-term prosperity. Nations that drift toward authoritarianism and government central planning are more likely to be less free and poorer in the long run.
This sounds strikingly simple. But during a time when many young Americans have embraced the siren song of collectivism and socialism over capitalism, it’s a finding that deserves to be shouted from the hills. Inequity among nations isn’t a matter of random chance. North Korea isn’t a basket case by accident. Venezuela hasn’t crumbled into poverty because of the weather. Ideas and economic systems matter.
It’s no coincidence that the U.S. Constitution — which creates “effective constraints on power-holders” and recognizes the value of property rights, an independent judiciary and personal freedom — provided the guardrails for the most prosperous nation on Earth.
The work of these Nobel laureates offers a path forward for impoverished nations — if they choose to take it. Let’s hope progressive Democrats are also paying attention.
